In honor of today’s release of Life Free or Die Hard, I thought I’d do a quick rundown of the other Die Hards, all three of which I saw again recently.
Die Hard–In my opinion, the best action movie ever made, bar none. Oddly enough, in a recent article, Entertainment Weekly agreed with me (of course). Why is it so good? It’s not just the awesome action sequences (can you go wrong with explosions and helicopters?). It’s got four big assets that send it over the top for me. One, the environment. Nakatomi Tower gave the perfect rat-in-a-trap vibe. Second, the hero. John McClane wasn’t a stone cold killer robot, like the Terminator (or Schwarzenegger, for that matter). He was heroic, daring, more than competent, and, let’s face it, seriously freaked out most of the time. And he was alone. Third, Holly McClane. It didn’t matter that they were barely in the movie together. She was the perfect woman-in-distress-but-able-to-hold-her-own character. Fourth, Hans Gruber. Alan Rickman pulled off the ultimate villian–cold, evil, and fun.
How ’bout the sequels?
Die Hard 2–Not quite as good as the original, but still pretty good. Even though McClane had the run of an entire airport, we still have the cramped vibe. Holly was present (albeit in a plane running on fumes) but still giving McClane the motivation to do what he does best. And Col. Stuart, although not as fun as Hans, was actually more evil (he crashed a passenger plane to make a point, for the love of Pete! )
Die Hard with a Vengeance–I was disappointed with this one. Pretty much everything that made the original so good was absent. John’s got all of New York City to run around it. He’s got a sidekick this time, Jeremy Iron’s villian wasn’t evil enough, and Holly wasn’t even there. Good action, but we can get that anywhere. In other words, it was good, but it wasn’t Die Hard good.
How ’bout the new one? I’ll let you know…